:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47403032/Screen_Shot_2015-10-12_at_8.53.12_PM.0.0.png)
I'm gonna do my best to get through this but, I may get frustrated and quit commenting on things.
Win Probability
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4152734/Screen_Shot_2015-10-12_at_8.53.12_PM.0.png)
Top 5 Plays
|
|
Play Number |
Offense |
Down |
Distance |
Spot |
Quarter |
Play Description |
Home Team Win Probability Before Play |
Home Team Win Probability Added |
|
1 |
4 |
Clemson |
3 |
1 |
66 |
1 |
Wayne Gallman Rush for 66, TOUCHDOWN |
0.552 |
0.154 |
|
2 |
24 |
Clemson |
1 |
10 |
78 |
1 |
Ray-Ray McCloud Rush for -2, FUMBLE |
0.837 |
-0.119 |
|
3 |
21 |
Georgia Tech |
4 |
7 |
81 |
1 |
PUNT |
0.872 |
-0.054 |
|
4 |
33 |
Clemson |
3 |
2 |
72 |
1 |
Deshaun Watson Pass to Jordan Leggett for 12, FIRST DOWN |
0.760 |
0.047 |
|
5 |
9 |
Georgia Tech |
3 |
7 |
77 |
1 |
Justin Thomas Pass to NA NA for 0, INTERCEPTION |
0.772 |
0.045 |
- This game got away from us rrreeeall quick. Clemson started the 2nd quarter with a 92% chance of winning the game. They then moved that to 98% within three plays, so that's good.
- I have no clue why our punt to Clemson in the 2nd quarter was such a great play. I guess it was a huge shift in field position, but that still seems like a large swing.
- Not much else to say when you get whooped so early...
Advanced Box Score
| Passing Downs | Quarter Performance | ||||||
| GT | Clem | GT | Clem | ||||
| Plays | 26 | 18 | Yards / Play | Success Rate | Yards / Play | Success Rate | |
| Yards / Play | 6.92 | 10.11 | Q1 | 0.77 | 8% | 8.52 | 57% |
| Success Rate | 23% | 44% | Q2 | 5.5 | 28% | 6.78 | 44% |
| Standard Downs | Q3 | 1.94 | 12% | 6.36 | 50% | ||
| GT | Clem | Q4 | 11 | 62% | 6.84 | 32% | |
| Plays | 30 | 56 | Down Performance | ||||
| Yards / Play | 1.67 | 6.34 | GT | Clem | |||
| Success Rate | 23% | 46% | Yards / Play | Success Rate | Yards / Play | Success Rate | |
| Passing Plays | 1 | 1.2 | 20% | 5.42 | 45% | ||
| GT | Clem | 2 | 9.28 | 33% | 5.33 | 38% | |
| Plays | 16 | 34 | 3 | 2 | 8% | 14.38 | 62% |
| Yards / Play | 9 | 9.79 | 4 | 9 | 100% | 0 | 0% |
| Success Rate | 31% | 59% | Drive Performance | ||||
| Sack Rate (SD / PD) | 4% / 3% | 0% / 6% | Num Drives | Avg Start Spot | % Methodical | % Explosive | |
| Running Plays | GT | 12 | 70 | 0% | 17% | ||
| GT | Clem | Clem | 14 | 73 | 21% | 21% | |
| Plays | 40 | 40 | % of Possible Yards Gained | GT: 26% | Clem: 54% | ||
| Yards / Play | 2.15 | 5.15 | Georgia Tech Hidden Yards | 36 | |||
| Success Rate | 20% | 35% | Turnovers | GT: 1 | Clem: 3 | ||
So many things wrong here I don't know where to start
- On first downs we averaged 1.2 yards per play, ONE POINT TWO!
- In the first quarter we averaged 0.8 yards per play. ZERO point eight. As in, on average, we gained less than one yard on each play. We combined that with an 8 percent success rate.
- Our defense actually limited them decently through the ground. They hit the one big run on the first possession, but still only averaged 5.15 yards per rush on only a 35% success rate, so that's good.
- Our 3rd down defense though, geez, that's pathetic.
Drive Chart
:format(webp):no_upscale()/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/4152932/Screen_Shot_2015-10-12_at_9.21.00_PM.0.png)
- Those first four possessions just.... all the sads.
That's all I got this week. We got our butt's kicked every which way. In a beatdown there ain't many silver linings in the box score.