Quick Hoops Recap: Georgia Tech defeats UGA, 68-56
At half time, I was a little concerned seeing Tech trailing by 4. The free throw attempt disparity and lack of aggressive play towards the hoop appeared to really be the difference at the half way mark. Tech only attempted one free throw in the first half to Georgia's 13 (2003-esque anyone?). Tech had zero bench points and 16 points in the paint in the first half while Georgia had 18 bench points and 8 points in the paint.
At the 14:12 mark in the second half, Tech went a 10-0 run and the lead never dropped below seven. Georgia couldn't match Tech point for point or athlete for athlete. Tech's bench picked up 15 points in the second half and the free throw shooting disparity swung from 1:13 in UGA's favor to 23:21 in Tech's favor.
I was thoroughly impressed with Gregory's first outing against UGA. This is how Tech should have dealt with UGA every game since 2002 but stubborn coaching and poor halftime adjustments kept a less talented squad alive late in games. I highly recommend Tech fans watch or attend as many games as you can this season. I think this scrappy team will win a hand full of ACC games. They may not go 0.500 in the ACC but we're also not playing the early 2000's ACC competition anymore. Any thoughts from fans who attended or watched the game on FSN?
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Watching the game...
there was a huge surge in aggressiveness in the 2nd half. I think we only took one single FT in the entire 1st half (and of course missed it)…but had uGA in the Bonus with 11 minutes remaining in the 2nd half. Jason Morris got a hot hand in the 2nd half as well, hitting 3 3-pointers in a row.
But the reason we had any chance in this game was the low post scoring by Daniel Miller and Kamm Holsey…uGA had no answer for them…and it opened up the entire floor in the 2nd half.
"Reach down in there...TURN THAT DAMN THING UP!" - Coach Paul Johnson
This is good to hear
I didn’t get a chance to watch the game, so I can’t add any insight (basketball isn’t really my sport anyway so I don’t have much insight even when I watch the games). I think I’ll enjoy watching this season unfold.
basketball ignorance
Basketball has never been a sport I paid much attention to and consequently I’m not familiar with many of the phrases.
What does it means to say that during a game a team had X points in the paint?
I watched a GT basketball game on TV the other week (I don’t recall the opponent. GT won.) and the announcers kept talking about a zone defense. They made it sound like it was something great and wonderful. Is there anything special about zone defenses in basketball?
by Dive Keep and Pitch on Dec 8, 2011 10:15 AM EST reply actions
points in the paint
Points in the paint are points from players near the basket like slam dunks, layups, or short range jumpshots.
Zone defense is like a zone defense in football. It gives offensive players space but it prevents a team from catching players with screens and picks and isolating weak defenders one on one with a strong offensive player. Hewitt almost always ran a man-man defense because of talent until his last years of the GT career.
I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.
I'll give it a shot...
Points in the paint are points scored, generraly, inside close to the basket. If a team has success scoring inside, it can draw defenders away from the perimeter and open up the offense for open jumpshots or cuts to the basket.
Zone defense tries to minimize your opponent’s ability to drive to the basket, and allows the defense to cheat to the side the ball is being played. To beat this, generally you have to set good screens and hit jumpers.
"Reach down in there...TURN THAT DAMN THING UP!" - Coach Paul Johnson
paint == lane, I always thought
The colored box area inside the free throw line, base line (out of bounds on the end), and adjacent sides.

by 




















