Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

The best traveling team (or biggest draw) in the ACC is...

I was thinking about our attendance problem and I decided to look at another angle. I wanted to see if Georgia Tech was drawing bigger crowds at road venues now that we're running the option. I pulled 2008-2011 attendance averages for our ACC opponents. Their overall average attendance was hurt on average by Georgia Tech visiting their venue by 57 fans. And a major contributor was the torrential downpour that occurred prior to the 2009 UVA game (-4,970 off their average 2009 attendance). If we take that game out of the equation, Tech yielded a benefit of 353 fans per game on our ACC road trips.

The amazingly proud traveling Hokie fans racked up an amazing +2,024 fans per road trip for their hosts. This blew Clemson and Miami out of the water (+213 and +617, respectively).

But the King Ding-a-lings of ACC road warriors were the Florida State Seminoles. The 'Noles netted opponents on average 5,578 more fans per game than season attendance averages. Big contributors were 2008 and 2010 Miami games where the 'Noles added 20k to the sparsely packed Miami stadiums. Even if you factor out the two Miami games, the 'Noles still netted 3,005 more fans than teams averaged since 2008. The massive Seminole fan base combined with the '90's mystique has to be the root cause. Any thoughts?

Comment 31 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Could you post the entire collection of figures?

I’d be curious where all the ACC schools stand.

www.riddickandreynolds.com

by RiddickAndReynolds on Oct 14, 2011 2:00 PM EDT reply actions  

yeah, I'll keep tallies up for the year

I only did a few teams thus far. It takes time to go through each team’s site. Certain schools don’t have the love of statistics as others.

I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.

by BirdGT on Oct 14, 2011 2:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

In general, and not specific to road teams bringing fans...

Atlanta has always been apathetic about fandom.

1. There is a lot to do in the city besides ball games
2. Folks with money aren’t all that excited to drive downtown for anything
3. Big sports fans are from somewhere else, so a Falcons game isn’t interesting unless their hometown Steelers are in town (similar to your FSU findings)
4. We haven’t always been a winning town (Falcons, Braves, Hawks, Jackets post SEC, Chiefs, etc.)
6. Atlanta is a “newer” city post Billy Sherman, so our teams don’t have the duration of existence of other cities, hence, Grandfathers don’t pass it on to Fathers to Son (except in the case of WFeather).
7. The ACC is notoriously slim on Football attendance as compared to Basketball. You can see why the SEC would only want VT and/or FSU. See: ACC Championship game ticket sales

I am glad to see that we add to our road hosts totals, and I can see the effect of Clemson and VT visits on the Upper North Stands every other year at BDS@GF.

Come worship at the Heavy Metal Altar of Molten British Steel....
Come...Smoke with the Priest

by DressHerInWhiteAndGold on Oct 14, 2011 2:09 PM EDT reply actions  

1 and 2 are issues in most large cities with sports teams

so those don’t count. however, number three has and always will be our biggest concern, Atlanta too much a melting pot for any consistency. They don’t have those problems up north, espcially the steelers. Their season ticket WAITING LIST is 80000 deep. That’s loyalty to your team AND your city right there.

Paul Johnson: not giving a crap about what you have to say since 1987.

by GTNate on Oct 14, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

you left out city density

Atlanta isn’t nearly as dense as other cities. Mass transit isn’t as good. It’s not a hop skip to the game and the games aren’t necessarily great for tailgating like our rural counterparts.

I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.

by BirdGT on Oct 14, 2011 2:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who builds a baseball stadium, and doesn't tie in the TRAIN?

Come worship at the Heavy Metal Altar of Molten British Steel....
Come...Smoke with the Priest

by DressHerInWhiteAndGold on Oct 14, 2011 4:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well we do have a waiting list somewhere around here

/and I highjack the thread

Come worship at the Heavy Metal Altar of Molten British Steel....
Come...Smoke with the Priest

by DressHerInWhiteAndGold on Oct 14, 2011 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

The ACC isn't a conference full of degree factories...

Aside from FSU, Maryland, VPI, Clemson…the ACC schools have a much smaller network if alumni and sidewalk alums. These other schools also generally populate their student body with more out-of-staters and foreigners, who are non-football fans to begin with or moonlighters.

It would be wonderful, from a fan’s view, to have 11/12 schools with an enrollment of 30K+ and a redneck fanbase with a distaste for pro sports…and $10K just lying around with nothing to do…to build the schools athletic coffers. But then again, I value the reputation of my degree more…

by TBuzz on Oct 14, 2011 3:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

The SEC is simply the Old South in new clothes...

I mean, even the people who generate the revenue are getting paid nothing…just like old times

by TBuzz on Oct 14, 2011 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Do ACC schools pay their players?

If not, what are they doing differently? Yeah,. they’re making less money but they’re still making money off of their players. That’s like saying “hey, I have slaves, but I don’t make them pick near as much cotton as my neighbors do”.

by FisheriesDawg on Oct 17, 2011 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buddy, I could write quite a bit about what the SEC has in common with the Old South. From allegiences to State-centric symbols and principles, to the worship of the Agrarian mentality, to the “under-the-surface” whispering about Turner Gil’s caucasian wife during the Auburn hiring process. SEC colleges (Vanderbilt excluded) are nothing more than organized Southern social gatherings centered around Sporting events and historic rituals.

Making a thinly-veiled reference to slavery is tongue-in-cheek. ACC schools do make money off the fotball program. However, the academics of ACC schools are enriched by football programs…not a detriment to their money-making potential. Other than Vanderbilt, which doesn’t have an Athletic department (and ridiculous excess Overhead), I can’t list a single SEC school where I see Academics getting equal or more acclaim as Athletics do…especially compared to several ACC schools.

Hell, how many UGA/UF/Bama/etc. players get incarcerated on a yearly basis? Tech’s program gets scrutinized for what…$312 in returned sports merchandise?

But this is a football blog, not a political one.

by TBuzz on Oct 18, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

You made a slavery reference regarding paying players.

Either an athletic department making money off of unpaid players is a form of slavery or it isn’t. Just because ACC schools can’t (don’t think they wouldn’t if they could) make as much money off of their “slaves” doesn’t change what it is. You’re giving the “they’re my slaves, but at least I treat my slaves well” argument here.

The rest of this is just the typical argument regarding the SEC that one almost always hears from Georgia Tech. There’s no point in getting into that here because I won’t change any minds and they really don’t have anything to do with your original implication.

by FisheriesDawg on Oct 18, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

THE IMPLICATION WAS A JOKE...maybe you should let it go.

You seem to be stuck on this whole “slaves” comment (which for some reason has seemed to touch a nerve with you). Student-athletes are an expense, although the value of a scholarship is iffy at best. I mean, at schools that have thousands upon thousands of students, the cost of faculty and classrooms are not going to change that much by adding an additional 85 student-athletes.

Let’s see, why does the SEC make more money than the ACC? Could it be that the Athletic fees from 11/12 schools with 30K+ enrollment get used to pump up marketing and recruiting budgets? Then let’s throw in the ignorant redneck fanbase who’s worlds revolve around the next SEC game on the calendar, and spend the ridiculous sums of money to just get on a list for tickets. I’m not impressed that the size of your hype machine is bigger than the size of mine….but that’s all that it is…Hype. It’s hype, rampant materialism, and a “have to have it all now” mentality that allow UGA fans to even entertain the ludicrous idea of firing Mark Richt, who’s a pretty damn good football coach and role model.

So to ask Tech to “get with the program” when it comes to generating revenue is asking Tech to not be what it is…a top-notch Engineering school (and 7th best Public university nationally) which, oh by the way, happens to have a richer history of sporting accomplishments (including more SEC titles than UGA in 30 less years).

The size of the Hype machine is the only difference. I wouldn’t want to live in that kind of world…

by TBuzz on Oct 18, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK.

I don’t know what any of that has to do with the price of tea in China, but good for you.

It clearly wasn’t just a joke given that it elicited two multi-paragraph responses, but if you’re willing to back off the implication that SEC football programs are slavemasters then I’m happy with that. As to why Georgia Tech is a smaller/less successful/whatever program than the SEC schools around it (not to mention Clemson, the closest ACC school) that isn’t really my concern. I have no interest in seeing Georgia Tech’s athletic prestige grow for obvious reasons.

By the way, Georgia Tech does not have more SEC titles than Georgia. In fact, it isn’t even close. Georgia has won the SEC 12 times. Georgia Tech won the SEC five times when it was a member.

by FisheriesDawg on Oct 18, 2011 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

You should probably go back to the Southern Conference and SIAA periods as well (recognized precursors to the Southeastern Conference).

But as I know from too many friends who are Gator fans…SEC fans are not below cherrypicking time periods to define their legacy…

by TBuzz on Oct 18, 2011 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

You said "SEC".

Not “SEC and similar previous conferences”

Even then, you’re still wrong. Check the links in my response and you’ll see that Georgia has 14 to Georgia Tech’s 13 even when you include SIAA and SoCon titles.

Then again, you’re just as guilty of cherry picking by including the teens/twenties and ignoring how superior Georgia’s program has been to Georgia Tech’s since Bobby Dodd left.

by FisheriesDawg on Oct 18, 2011 8:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ummm...

GT does have more SEC titles than UGA, I don’t know where you’re getting your information from.

Also, weren’t you the first person to mention slavery…?

by RamblinWreck7 on Oct 19, 2011 5:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

The links just three posts above yours.

They’re the text that shows up in a different color. If you would like to dispute them, I’d be happy to hear why.

TBuzz implied the slavery thing. He/she even admitted that in the reply. That’s pretty freakin’ obvious here whether I was the first person to call it out by name or not.

by FisheriesDawg on Oct 19, 2011 7:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I noticed it,

But you called it out by name. I don’t really understand how slavery got onto a football blog though…

by RamblinWreck7 on Oct 22, 2011 2:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Overzealous hatred...

of Georgia/the Southeastern Conference, probably.

by FisheriesDawg on Oct 22, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

I love watching the SEC and the Big 12.

I don’t see why people hate the SEC just because they are so good. I do hate teams paying players though, and there’s a big chance that the SEC is heavily involved in it.

Sorry, but I still hate UGA ;) Rivalrys I guess

by RamblinWreck7 on Oct 22, 2011 1:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buzz, this is a complicated issue to try to shed light on in a blog

There is actually a story coming out this week by an award winning writer about how college football uses players and how the NCAA is set up to protect adults from law suits not protect students from exploitation. A certain Alabama football player is used as an example of labor exploitation.

I am not going to give free advertising in this forum but if you check NPR’s reporting logs today you could find the magazine article and the author.

I do not totally agree with the article because some schools are an exception like Tech and try to give college athletes something in return for their services unlike several football factory conferences. The problem according to the author is that our society has entered a period of total denial when it comes to the levels of greed that are just accepted anymore as the cost of doing business.

by Atlanta's original team on Oct 22, 2011 8:10 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Nick Saban “catch and release” policy with high-caliber recruits is exactly how this system has gone wrong when the rules permit a coach to make promises to 18 year-olds and then treat them like it’s a business.

I’m not saying Tech or anyone else is absolved from this but generally, like Diddy said…Mo Money Mo Problems

"Reach down in there...TURN THAT DAMN THING UP!" - Coach Paul Johnson

by TBuzz on Oct 24, 2011 7:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yep.

If we are going to make an 18 year old suffer the adult world of “buyer beware” they ought to have recourse to compensation if they are “injured while on the job.” Yea, the current system is one that adults ought to be ashamed of.

by Atlanta's original team on Oct 24, 2011 8:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good post followed by the usual on-going angst over Atlanta fans and lack of support

The “round and round” of this expressed in the comments is only surpassed by the “round and round” that goes on in my head. In the end I just shake my head and admit that it baffles me. Bird’s comment about lack of density in the city does resonate however. There is another intangible that I can’t quite put my finger on. The only analogy that I can think of is the old saw about the difference in how Republicans seem to be united in everything they do and Democrats never seem to be able to unite in anything they do. This is an analogy not a political statement, so go with it for now.

There is something cantankerous about citizens in our cities that resists flocking in support of anything long term. It is not that decent numbers can’t show up for various events, it is that these numbers are not commensurate with the numbers one would suspect given the population numbers. Also there is a lack of stamina over time if any impediment appears.

So here are some apples and oranges comparisons. Statesboro, Georgia has a population of around 27,000 and when visiting there I have been hard pressed to find a decent restaurant. By comparison, Portsmouth, New Hampshire has a population of around 21,000 and has something like 81 critically acclaimed restaurants and is a national foodie destination.

Macon, Georgia has a population of around 91,300 and is the home to several colleges. Burlington, Vermont has a population of around 42,400 but as a college town has ten times as much going on in the club, restaurant and bar scene than Macon has.

Augusta, Georgia has a population of around 196,000 but its downtown energy level is put to shame by Portland, Maine, with a population of 66,194.

Much could be written about Atlanta and the urban planning (or lack thereof) that took place in the 60’s and 70’s. Until more recent decades Atlanta used to dry up after work hours and on weekends as everyone fled home to their TV’s and suburban homes. Unlike older Northern cities, Atlanta actually went through a period of discouraging downtown living. The city was even cut up by a downtown interchange that for awhile all but eliminated pedestrian walking. Atlanta’s efforts to turn this around are well known and they have been partly successful but unlike cities with a longer sustained history, Atlanta’s downtown is not the prime location for much of anything on a grand scale. There is not a major shopping boulevard downtown, no major art section or restaurant section or jazz club section or anything else that one often finds concentrated in cities in other parts of the country.

I am not trying to rag on Atlanta (as some will probably accuse me of) I am simply saying that Tech’s attendance issues cannot be viewed in a vacuum. The city itself has a certain pace and feel about it that tends to produce desultory results to most enterprises that require large on-going support downtown.

by Atlanta's original team on Oct 14, 2011 4:14 PM EDT reply actions   4 recs

wow

thats a rec

Better to have died a small boy than to drop this football - John Heisman FromTheRumbleSeat

Twitter, twitter, twitter

by Winfield Featherston on Oct 16, 2011 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Snooky's - Statesboro

Granted, the restaurant scene in Statesboro isn’t great, but they do have SnookPac, a registered PAC!

They also had 25,500 for the UT Chattanooga game, and are looking to go from 20,000 to 30,000 seats.

Yep, Atlanta dried up after 6 pm. Maybe there is a turnaround with Atlantic Station et al, but I still don’t see mobs outside The Ted like Fenway…

Come worship at the Heavy Metal Altar of Molten British Steel....
Come...Smoke with the Priest

by DressHerInWhiteAndGold on Oct 14, 2011 4:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Some of my best friends are sociologists :-)

And they would explain this through a host of cultural issues. I think there is hope for Atlanta, being the eternal optimist that I am, but one has to first acknowledge the cultural trends one is up against. Speaking of Fenway, I have learned not to schedule meetings too late on certain days because everybody and their grandmother (literally their grandmother) will be watching the Sox when they come on TV.

by Atlanta's original team on Oct 15, 2011 8:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to FromTheRumbleSeat, a "bastion of capitalization and grammar skills."

SHOP THE FROM THE RUMBLE SEAT STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Regional Co-Managers

Hokiesplat_small BirdGT

Gravatar_small Winfield Featherston

Assistants to the Regional Managers

Ramblinracket_small Ramblin Jeff

Orwin_smith_small Jesse28

Dscn2741cropped_small orientalnc

Nate_small GTNate

Images_small Atlanta's original team

Small LilBroey700

Directors of Personnel

Small acedarney