A recap of Georgia Tech-Kansas
We've let the dust settle. It took a good three days but it has finally subsided. Today, we're recapping the Kansas game and how the Kansas Jayhawks defeated the Yellow Jackets. I usually don't recap right away because I've gotta wait for ramblinwreck.com to publish the box score. I watch the NFL on Sunday so that's kinda my brain's day to relax. Then, I write my thoughts up on Monday morning for a Tuesday post. It's still fresh and the emotion has kinda worn off.
First off, let's look at what the Jayhawks did against us defensively. According to Owen Kemp at Rock Chalk, the Jayhawks used a version of the 3-3-5 to balance their defense and more importantly to prevent the big plays on the edge. Here's a graph on how our A-backs, B-backs, and Quarterbacks yards per carry changed throughout the progression of the game. To me, it appeared Kansas focused all of their efforts towards stopping Nesbitt and Allen at the LOS and kinda fending off the chop blocks on the edge as the A-Backs almost always got their yards.
For me, there were three things that killed us: penalties, third down conversions, and field position. In 2009, Georgia Tech averaged 47 yards in penalties per game. Against Kansas, we managed 9 penalties totaling 91 yards. Tell me if these box score lines mean anything to you:
4th and 2, KU 38...Rojas, Alonso punt 47 yards to the GT 15, fair catch by Tarrant, J., PENALTY GT roughing the kicker (Richardson, L.) 15 yards to the GT47, 1ST DOWN KU, NO PLAY.
3rd and 16, KU 43...Webb, Jordan pass complete to Wilson, Johnath for 10 yards to the GT47 (Butler, M.), PENALTY GT roughing passer (Jefferson, B.) 15 yards to the GT32, 1ST DOWN KU.
The first penalty extended a stalled out Kansas offense until we fortunately intercepted Webb on the GT 32. The second penalty was followed by Kansas' go ahead and eventual winning touchdown rather than a 4th and 6 punt. I am merely pointing these penalties out because they were exceedingly frustrating, to me (probably moreso to CPJ). Some might even call them SUPER LAME penalties.
Concerning 3rd down conversions, Georgia Tech wrote the book on converting third downs. CPJ's offense is supposed to create manageable third downs with well executed first and second downs. Kansas' off-color defense really threw the Jackets for a loop and prevented consistency from drive to drive. It was boom or bust. Exactly 50% of our plays netted 3 yards or less (31% of them didn't net any yards at all). Converting only 4 of 13 third down attempts was the 4th worst conversion percentage in a game since CPJ's been at Tech.
Looking at our average down and distance shows what happened. Our average 2nd down was 7.18 yards to gain the first, our average 3rd down was 5.50 yards to gain the first, and our average 4th down was 5.88 yards to gain the first. When we converted the third down, it was a big time play (22.3 yards per play) but when we failed to convert, the play blew up in our face (0.60 yards per play). There was no middle ground. There was no rhythm.
Field position was marginally relevant but still worthy of discussion. KU scoring drives started on average from the Kansas 40 while Georgia Tech scoring drives started on average from the GT 30. Both teams average drive started around their own 32 with Kansas owning a slight edge in this department.
Ultimately, miscues, penalties, and inconsistent offensive execution seem to be the theme for our loss. Hopefully, we can iron out some wrinkles for the North Carolina Tar Heels and rebound as ACC play begins. I will look at some defensive stats later this week. Any thoughts?
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
First, the same old thought
which is that this offense is “timing-sensitive” and must be fully functioning before encountering teams that throw in surprising defensive wrinkles.
The second thought is that I can’t imagine how CPJ is going to get this team ready for the studs playing for UNC.
by Atlanta's original team on Sep 14, 2010 9:25 AM EDT reply actions
I honestly don't think
we’ll see the defensive complexity we saw this weekend that stifled us for the rest of the season (minus bowl game).
I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.
that's reasssuring to a point
but the first two games have shown us that Tech still doesn’t have its timing down. Do you think we can get that together before UNC?
by Atlanta's original team on Sep 14, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Pass completion percentage must improve
If I’m a defensive coordinator, I’m going to sell out to stop the run with eight and nine men in the box until GT proves it can reliably complete passes. GT doesn’t have to pass often or deep, but if the play action pass isn’t working there is nothing stopping the defense from crashing down on the run on every play. It’s like a pass based team being unable to run a draw play – the defense could blitz on every play.
One thing I saw in the Kansas game was that several times on running plays Nesbitt got tackled behind the LOS before he had a chance to take more than a couple steps. I don’t know if the OL was missing blocks or if Kansas was selling out to stop the run, but I’d never seen a defense so consistently get to Nesbitt behind the LOS on the running plays. It was like eating a bowl of Rice Crispys: snap-mesh-tackle.
by Dive Keep and Pitch on Sep 14, 2010 9:51 AM EDT reply actions
The numbers are very disappointing
when you see that we out-numbered them for the most part except for the score. The Lawrence paper had a big front page about it. In summary: Somehow Georgia Tech did allll of this better than us, but we still won.
Better to have died a small boy than to drop this football - John HeismanFromTheRumbleSeat
by Winfield Featherston on Sep 14, 2010 10:10 AM EDT reply actions
One thing that was obvious watching the Orange Bowl
is that GT’s offense isn’t balanced. Take away the run and the passing game goes with it. Moreover, I don’t think a team needs a complex defensive scheme to beat GT. Iowa’s defense is far from complex — they just execute extremely well.
What's your deal?
by PCarroll_u_sm(j)irk on Sep 14, 2010 10:14 AM EDT reply actions
Iowa and Kansas defenses were very different
Kansas didn’t have the DL to stop GT up front. They used good pursuit and blitzes to mess with the timing and meshes. I don’t remember many blitzes from Iowa at all just a dominating front 4.
I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.
I agree
The defenses are very different — Iowa doesn’t blitz much because the line is so strong they really don’t need to. The main point, however, is that it seems to me that GT lives or dies on its ability to run. Teams that have an equally strong passing game are better equipped to exploit weakness in an opponent’s secondary. Don’t get me wrong, there’s a lot to like about GT, I just think the lack of an effective passing game is really hurting you guys right now.
What's your deal?
by PCarroll_u_sm(j)irk on Sep 14, 2010 7:12 PM EDT up reply actions
Yards after contact
As a follower of all things Tech for the past two decades, the past few years have been exciting. The fun came from watching Bay Bay stiff arm a CB or safety, and blaze a trail for 20+ yards. With the few receptions thus far, It seems like we have not had many yards after contact. More is being asked of other A and B backs as inside receivers. The plays work if we could catch – on many of the plays, we had fooled the defense. we just didn’t execute. Better execution, less Tom-foolery, we’ll be back in business.
by twojackets on Sep 14, 2010 9:48 PM EDT via mobile reply actions

by 





















