The Tale of The Transitioning D
The goal today is to kinda prep everyone statistically and visually for what we should be seeing in a fully functioning 3-4 defense. In short, who should be making the tackles and who should be eating up blockers? This is a simple graphic illustrating the percentage of tackles racked up by Jon Tenuta's primary starters and backups from 2006-2007. This was an era dominated by Philip Wheeler in the middle and some nasty defensive linemen in Joe Anoai, Adamm Oliver, and Michael Johnson. The linebackers were expected to make about 30% of the tackles, the line made 27%, and the secondary was expected to pick up 43% of the tackles. Good tackling safeties were a must.
As we transitioned into the Wommack years, I think the diesels on defensive line really carried the team in 2008. Unfortunately, there's a pretty big drop off in defensive line production over this two year span. The line only accounted for 23% of the meaningful tackles, the linebackers picked up 31%, and the secondary increased to 46%. If we removed 2008 from those two years, the D line only accounted for 20% of the defense's tackles. I don't want to beat the dead horse anymore than I have to but I'd really like to explain these percentages in more tangible numbers. Basically, the defensive line went from making ~12 tackles per game under Tenuta to roughly ~8 tackles per game in Wommack's last season. Here's a look at Wommack's D in the CPJ era:
Now, the Grohfense data is gonna be pulled from the last years at UVA (2008-2009). We already know the outside linebackers are gonna rack up sacks and tackles for loss as the job of pass rushing is no longer the primary job of the defensive ends. And whoever is dubbed the "Human Ton" better expect a lot of tackles this season as the nose tackle position racked up about 14% of the Grohfense's tackles from 2008-2009. Check out the visual aid:
I understand two years isn't a very long time and a single player (e.g. Philip Wheeler) can totally skew the data but I think that we can still pull some ideas from these charts. Obviously, the 3-4 relies heavily on the nose tackle. Obviously, we had some struggles at defensive line last season. And finally, I think any sane person would hope we'll see marked improvement from our secondary under Groh if our linebackers can apply more pressure to the QB this season than our DL did last season. Any thoughts?
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A few thoughts . . .
Another great, thought provoking discussion – Thanks! When I think of increased pass rush, I think of the opposing offenses running more s reen plays. If my memory serves me well, Our Womack teams were burned often with screen plays. In fact, I remember Clumpson using the screen rather well – allowing them to get back in the game during our regular season match up last year. Of course ther are countr assignments on the D to prevent long yardage gains during a screen. I just hope we’re quick enough to adjust. Question: Does the Groh defense believe in frequent rotation of the linebackers. It seems that the Womack D did try to keep fresh legs – but perhaps at the expense of continuity within the LBs and the secondary.
by twojackets on Aug 13, 2010 8:27 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
For this study...
Tenuta only really used 4 linebackers per year as his primary players. Womack used 5.5 per year. Groh used 5 per year. Groh also has one more linebacker playing in his formation. Womack’s tendency to rotate guys might’ve been more indicative of injuries but also lack of a Philip Wheeler-every-play-type player.
I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.
Other differences
Speaking to a former GT DB, he predicts more manned coverage this fall. As usual, practical discipline is needed to cover the assignments, especially when the blitz is on. Any word on our depth at NT? If this role becomes the ‘primary’ action guy, what should a fan expect from this position this year?
by twojackets on Aug 13, 2010 9:33 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Tenuta had much better LB's than Wommack
Before Wheeler, there was Daryl Smith and Key Fox and Gerris Wilkinson. Since Wheeler (and maybe Gary Guyton), we haven’t had much to work with at that position.
The potential was there with Brad Jefferson, Kyle Jackson, and Sedrick Griffin, but it never panned out for Wommack…maybe Groh will reap those rewards.
Once again a quality post, thank you
This conversation has come up before so I am repeating myself. I believe that unless Tech’s nose is completely horrible this year that is not going to be the key to this defense. I am really hoping that the outside linebackers are ready to play like wild men. Then in a couple of years we add the All American nose tackle and, voila! you have one of the top defenses in the country.
I will be glad when our safeties are not making game saving tackles on drive after drive.
by Atlanta's original team on Aug 13, 2010 9:45 AM EDT reply actions
I agree wholeheartedly
I will be glad when our safeties are not making game saving tackles on drive after drive.
I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.
Let's hope
That we have at least an All-ACC nose on the roster right now. We’ve got plenty of candidates…they just need to produce on the field.
I am pumped about the Secondary
For this season and the next 2-3. Once we get the top DL’s and LB’s in we are going to have a really tough D.

by 















