Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dana White Announces Koscheck vs. Hendricks for UFC on FOX

Where I Come From: Expectations for the Season

GT's in the game.

This post is sponsored by EA Sports NCAA Football 2011.

As part of our EA Sports series, we wanted to take a look into the crystal ball. I surveyed over 200 readers and contributors of Georgia Tech message boards and From the Rumble Seat last week to gauge the excitement of our fan base for this coming season. The form asked users to predict Georgia Tech's chances of victory for each game of the 2010 season. The scale ranged from 0% chance of victory to 100% chance of victory in increments of 12.5%. Tech fans most popular choice was 100% chance of victory per game as over 574 games were considered guaranteed locks by the 205 readers (23.3% of the votes counted). Only 4 GT "fans" considered some of the games zero-percent chance of victory (1 Clemson vote, 1 VPISU vote, and 2 Georgia votes). For more detail click the jump...

Star-divide

Record_medium

The above chart breaks down the final record of every one of the 205 voters. So I broke down each voter's submission like so: a win meant the voter predicted GT would win more than 50% of the time against an opponent, a tie meant GT would win 50% of the time, and a loss was GT would win less than 50% of the time. Out of the 2,460 games picked by the 205 voters, GT fans picked 1,904 wins (77.4% of the time). That's not too shabby. There were only 375 predicted ties and 181 losses. If each tie were considered half a loss and half a victory, then the average record for those polled was 10.2-1.79 (or for brevity's sake 10-2). Below is a breakdown on a game by game basis of all those polled:

Record2_medium

Looking from game to game, you can see the GT base's relative confidence in the average row. South Carolina State, Middle Tennessee, Duke, and UVA all fall into the "cupcake division" according to our fan base as all four feature a <15% chance of survival against Paul Johnson. Wake, NC State, and Kansas fall into the "not-so-easy division". Miami, Clemson, UNC, and Georgia fall into the "tough division" as they probably should. And VPI is the only team that currently has a >50% chance of victory against GT amongst Tech fans polled. Here's a breakdown of how confident GT fans were against the supposed 5 toughest opponent's on our schedule:

Record3_medium

The distribution of choices is quite interesting. There's an obvious fear amongst Tech fans about going on the road to several big rivals this year. For example, Clemson without Kyle Parker and C.J. Spiller garnered a marginally lower confidence rating than Miami (a team that decimated us last year). Even the standard deviations are about equal meaning there is comparable certainty amongst the voters on their Miami/Clemson selections.

I included an optional input in the survey that included location. I just kinda wanted to gauge confidence in the season based on poller's location but knew I'd not have a whole lot of time to break down the poll. The only major correlation I found was that people within the perimeter are less confident about the Georgie game than those outside the perimeter. The standard deviation is also higher amongst Atlanta Tech fans (0.19) than Tech fans outside the City (0.15) with regards to Georgie. Only 99 fans responded with their location so these results aren't quite as thorough as the entire poll but I still found it to be an interesting tidbit.

The final nugget of trivia I'd like to present about the poll is the number 2.10%. This is the chance of going undefeated based on the combined results of all 205 Tech fans polled. If we multiply the odds of winning each game, we get the following chart showing the odds of going 1-0, 2-0...and so on to 12-0.

Records4_medium

Even a team like Alabama that's probably favored to win all of their games big time (90%^12) would only have a ~28% chance of going undefeated. That's pretty cool, eh? What are your thoughts on the poll results? Why did certain teams gain respect in your mind even though Tech defeated them last year (UNC/Clemson) while some teams lost respect despite beating Tech (uga/Miami)?

Comment 18 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Interesting data and good questions at the end

My answers were, perhaps like most fans, from the gut. It is clearly not “scientific” but it is not entirely devoid of reason either. So it goes kind of like this for me.

I viewed last year’s Miami game as an aberration. Tech had played way too many games in too few days and was frankly tired and slow looking last year. This year revenge will be a motivator.

Likewise (against all reason has expressed by the pundits) I feel fairly confident about Virginia Tech. The reason is that they have not dominated Tech in recent years and our players never seem intimidated by them. Hence I think we play up to our level which gives CPJ time to work his magic against what might otherwise be considered a superior team.

Clemson scares the “you know what” out of me. They are tired of losing to Tech. They are fast and they are motivated. They will have crazy fans and plenty of time to prepare.

I can’t remember how I voted exactly but I know I was more worried about “trap games” than I was the obvious “big games.”

The Georgia game is a hard one to pick but if you put away the obvious fear and loathing that Tech fans feel about playing Georgia in Athens the truth is that I have yet to see Georgia dominate a CPJ coached Tech team. Certainly they outplayed Tech last year but they were still lucky to have won it. I honestly feel like if that fourth down pass is caught Tech marches down for the winning score and time runs out.

by Atlanta's original team on Jul 12, 2010 8:54 AM EDT reply actions  

I was uber confident against Clemson

because we own them. hahhahaha

I put 50/50 against uga.

Better to have died a small boy than to drop this football - John HeismanFromTheRumbleSeat

by Winfield Featherston on Jul 12, 2010 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

God I love this Blog

Question of the day: Could anyone from UGA understand any of this?

On a more serious note, I think its our time against climpson, because despite what everyone says I think Dabo is an excellent coach, and they are just plain sick of losing to us. I say 9-3 overall solely based on line play, I’ve been saying ever since 2008 that’s what will hold us back. We lost the Orange Bowl because our line wasn’t big/strong enough, plain and simple. Even the math says big line = big wins But when the big recruits from the past two years come in knowledgeable of the system and ready to play in 2011, I think we have a serious shot at an undefeated season and an MNC. Book it.

by GTNate on Jul 12, 2010 10:14 AM EDT reply actions  

The answer to your question

“Question of the day: Could anyone from UGA understand any of this?”
There are enough pictures to help them out.

by Atlanta's original team on Jul 13, 2010 7:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thursday in Blacksburg

has us shakin

Better to have died a small boy than to drop this football - John HeismanFromTheRumbleSeat

by Winfield Featherston on Jul 12, 2010 10:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Is anyone still seeing uga ads on FTRS?

Should be gone. Winfield says he is but I have only seen random other universities.

I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.

by BirdGT on Jul 12, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

I still see them

I am only seeing Tech and UGA ads. The main “header” banner at the top has been nothing but UGA for me and the side ads have switched back and forth between the 2 schools.

by Yellow Jackette on Jul 12, 2010 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

I refreshed

And I got UGA at the top and Iowa on the right. I went to the main page and I got a mixed SEC ad up top and on the right. I keep refreshing on a separate tab and I get random schools each time in both ads.

"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.

by Jesse28 on Jul 12, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

If we have 205 people to vote on this poll

…then why do the same 5-10 people post comments? I thought the same thing when we were doing the greatest city thing. Is everyone just voting a bunch of times, or do we actually have this many people who come to the site and not write anything?

by acedarney on Jul 12, 2010 3:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I posted form on the Hive for responses, too

but yeah, there are a lot of people who do not comment. They just read daily. The City Debate has been taken hostage by the most popular CFB blog ever (mgoblog).

I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.

by BirdGT on Jul 12, 2010 3:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe I'm just wierd

But I quit reading and posting on the Falcoholic just because it exploded with people. There’s just sooo much noise to read through.

"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.

by Jesse28 on Jul 13, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

ugh *weird

"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.

by Jesse28 on Jul 13, 2010 3:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

You mean you don't enjoy a nice daily read about signing Terrell Owens?

Excuse my language, ma'am, but that damn Dodd's gonna beat my butt today. -- Bear Bryant, November 1962

SB Nation Atlanta · The Falcoholic · Blog · Twitter

by Jason Kirk on Jul 14, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's not that

The content is excellent. I’ve been a commenting member since ‘07 on the Falcoholic and Dave, Adam, and you all do an excellent job. It’s just the in the last year the amount of people on the site has exploded and there’s just way too much to read through, some of which gives me that AJC feel. I think you and I both know that’s never a good thing.

Commercializing the site and the explosion in readership is great for you guys and I applaud you all for making it the best damned Falcons site I’ve ever seen, it’s just not my tastes. Once the season gets close to starting, I’m sure I will be all over it again though.

I kinda feel like I just gave you that whol “it’s not you, it’s me” line. Did I just dump you? Haha

"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.

by Jesse28 on Jul 15, 2010 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

Of course

As soon as I type that I decide to go check it out and there really aren’t that many posting right now. That’s what I get for not checking it out through the off season, so here’s my attempt at an excuse…

Hawks were in the playoffs
GT basketball
GT baseball
World Cup
Braves trying to lead the division again

le sigh

"You could spend the next fifteen seconds of your life watching a man and a tiger scream together, or you could be an idiot."
Fact.

by Jesse28 on Jul 15, 2010 8:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

It's all good. I'm just kidding.

Excuse my language, ma'am, but that damn Dodd's gonna beat my butt today. -- Bear Bryant, November 1962

SB Nation Atlanta · The Falcoholic · Blog · Twitter

by Jason Kirk on Jul 15, 2010 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to FromTheRumbleSeat, a "bastion of capitalization and grammar skills."

SHOP THE FROM THE RUMBLE SEAT STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Regional Co-Managers

Hokiesplat_small BirdGT

Gravatar_small Winfield Featherston

Assistants to the Regional Managers

Ramblinracket_small Ramblin Jeff

Orwin_smith_small Jesse28

Dscn2741cropped_small orientalnc

Nate_small GTNate

Images_small Atlanta's original team

Small LilBroey700

Directors of Personnel

Small acedarney