Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Randy Moss A Raven?

TV Exposure for GT Football

I remember my freshman year's football season at Tech vividly. Reggie Ball was a true freshman. Chan Gailey had settled in to college coaching finally. Tenuta's defense was starting to take form. We beat Auburn. I listened to Wes Durham call three games on the radio that season. That's the most complete games I've ever listened to on the radio in a single season just because of how much television exposure Georgia Tech receives now-a-days. And when I went back and looked at the schedules, 2003 was the only season in the past 10 or 11 years in which Tech's games weren't televised over half of the time. Television is taking over. I still try to listen to the radio for games as much as possible. To me, there's nothing better than listening to Wes Durham on the computer over a DVR-delayed ESPN game.

Concerning exposure, however, I wanted to look at how much television exposure Tech has received since 1999 (oldest tv schedule I could find on rw.com). After digging through 11 old schedules, I found ABC to be Tech's favorite television destination. We've been on ABC 36 times over the past 11 years (3.27 times/per season). The second most was ESPN with 29 appearances for Tech. Here's a quick run down of all the channels Tech's played on and our winning percentage on each channel since 1999:

Css1_medium

The easiest observation to make from the table is that we play good opponents on CBS, ESPN, NBC, or Fox versus playing jobbers on Raycom, CSS, or ESPNU. Another interesting observation is that if you consider all of our appearances on the major stations as national telecasts, GT has racked up over 270 hours on "semi-national" television from our football team since 1999. That can't be bad for a school's notoriety. Add in the highlight reels and you're talking about a lot of publicity.

The final table I was gonna throw at you is the breakdown per year of each station and its relationship with GT Football. I've also got the most important stat of 'em all: percent of games televised versus percent of games not televised. And for your information, my freshman year was the worst of the bunch at only 46.2% of games on TV...

Css2_medium

What facts do we pull from this chart? Let's look at the man behind the scenes: Radakovich. Percentage of games televised from 1999-2005 was 73.6%. Percentage of games televised after Radakovich's hire has been 90.7%. That's a pretty big increase. Factor in increased number of football tv outlets, better on the field performance, and you've got a winner for Radakovich.

What are your thoughts?

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think it's mostly outlets

When I was in school there were one national game and one regional game each Saturday on TV. That was it. I’m not sure how many games there were for the regional game, but it may have been just two. We only got to see one, anyway. In 1978 we were on twice nationally and twice regionally.

The amazing thing is that we knew what time each game would be when the season started. No TBAs. We could make plans. Night games were rare (there were no lights in Athens).

by CraigT on Apr 20, 2010 7:06 PM EDT reply actions  

ABC != National

Having lived in Ann Arbor and Seattle for the last 6 falls, I cannot consider ABC games to be national telecasts. The 3:30pm game is always regional, split between at least 2 regions, sometimes 4. Even the ABC Saturday Night games aren’t always national as the debacle against Georgia this fall was only seen in the Southeast. The rest of the country got ND-Stanford. http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2009/abcespn2-coverage-map-for-november-28-800-pm-games/

Check out the other weeks for the ACC on ABC: http://www.hdsportsguide.com/news/2009/abc-coverage-map/. Only a couple Miami or FSU games begin to spread into other regions.

I’m just bitter that we always get crappy Pac-10 games and usually it’s USC.

Fan of: Cards, Blues, Yellow Jackets, Rams, Wolverines, and Blazers.

by ColinMacLeod on Apr 21, 2010 6:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't think it was D-Rad

But instead the growth of smaller media stations. I may stand corrected, but I don’t believe Raycom was around or broadcasted nearly the number of games it does now 3-4 years ago. May not have had an ACC deal. Plus with the SEC ESPN deal, there are certainly more opportunities for ACC television.

Main support for my point is the national television networks (ABC, CBS, Fox, ESPN 1&2). We typically have 8-9 broadcasts every year, and that hasn’t increased since DRad got in place. The only person who seemed to influence the 8-9 was Calvin Johnson.

Regardless of who is Athletic Director I think we’d get all of our games “televised.” ESPN360 is new and Raycom probably would have picked up most of our games (especially as division leader) anyways.

by Howell on Apr 22, 2010 8:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to FromTheRumbleSeat, a "bastion of capitalization and grammar skills."

SHOP THE FROM THE RUMBLE SEAT STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Regional Co-Managers

Hokiesplat_small BirdGT

Gravatar_small Winfield Featherston

Assistants to the Regional Managers

Ramblinracket_small Ramblin Jeff

Orwin_smith_small Jesse28

Dscn2741cropped_small orientalnc

Nate_small GTNate

Images_small Atlanta's original team

Small LilBroey700

Directors of Personnel

Small acedarney