Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: In Crunch Time, Spurs Don't Change Their Game

Georgia Tech: Where Special Teams Aren't Necessarily Special...

When you're looking at Special teams statistics, you see kicking percentages, punting and kickoff distances, coverage type stuff, and return yardage. The singular most important factor in special teams is often missing: field position. Good special teams gets the offense out of the shadow of their own goal post. Good special teams pins an opponent on their own 10 yard line with a sky high punt. So let's check out some basic special teams stats:

Spec1_medium

On initial inspection of special teams stats, it would appear GT is on par or better in several special teams stats. We don't have a great punt team but our kick coverage and field goal team appear to be pretty good. What is left out? Field position is left out of these basic stats. Where is GT after it fields a punt? Where is our opponent after we punt to them? This is where things fall apart for Georgia Tech. I broke it down below with SC State/MTSU in the first row and without in the second

Spec2_medium

Basically, against BCS-calibre opponents, we're giving up 9 yards of field position every exchange of punts. We've punted about four times per game so opponents are basically being spotted 36 yards per game because of poor coverage, short punts, shanks, or penalties. We're matching up fine with our BCS opponents in kickoff coverage concerning starting field position.

The following table is the table that explains what everyone is seeing but can't find on cfbstats.com. It's a table of how many punts and kickoffs result in a drive inside the 20, a touchback, or outside of the twenty. For example, Georgia Tech stops all opposing kick returners inside the twenty 19% of the time and only 9% of all Georgia Tech punts result in a touchback.

Spec3_medium

In this chart, the important section is the bottom three rows (stats without SC State and MTSU). Note that 73% of kick returners on BCS caliber teams get past the twenty against Georgia Tech's coverage team. 70% of all Georgia Tech punts result in an opposing drive starting outside of the twenty yard line. We're only returning 65% of kickoffs outside the twenty and only 52% of all punts received result in GT starting outside the twenty. We're giving up field position left and right on special teams. We already knew this team was struggling with respects to field position. Factor in a bad kicking game and we're an even worse offensive and defensive football team.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Cause vs. Effect

Since Tech is much more likely to go for it 4th down when around mid-field I wouldn’t expect a lot of punts to be covered inside the 20. Likewise, if Tech turns it over on downs near mid-field and then holds the opponent to 3 and out I would expect to get the ball back inside the 20 more often.

by ee8384 on Nov 17, 2010 1:04 PM EST reply actions  

I agree.

What’s missing in the punt data is the spot from where the punter kicked. Are we getting out kicked, or is the opposition simply kicking from further down the field?

by Dive Keep and Pitch on Nov 17, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

averages

GT punts on average from the Georgia Tech 36 yard line. With an average punting distance of only ~37 yards, we’re usually 10 or so yards short of the 20 every punt.

GT attempts to convert 4th downs on average from the Opponent’s 38 yard line. This is right at the limit of our punting range, which gives your point a lot of validity.

Also note that the average GT field goal was made from 35 yards with a max of 47 yards (Opponent’s 18 and 30 yard lines respectively). And this is the part that makes CPJ look kinda like a genius. We’ve only failed on one fourth down attempt within Scott Blair’s range in 2010 out of 10 attempts.

I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.

by BirdGT on Nov 17, 2010 1:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Kickoff field position

What’s interesting is that the first two tables say that GT and the opposition have the same starting point after kickoffs despite that fact that the third table says 73% of the time the opponents get a starting position outside of the 20 yard line while starts outside of the 20 yard line only 65% of the time. I guess the conclusion there is that the opposition gets a lot of starting field positions in that 21-24 yard range as opposed to a lot of 35 and 45 yd starting positions.

by Dive Keep and Pitch on Nov 17, 2010 1:39 PM EST reply actions  

good question

I should’ve posted a distribution of opposing/GT returns. Unfortunately, I didn’t save the work…

I write stuff From the Rumble Seat.

by BirdGT on Nov 17, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to FromTheRumbleSeat, a "bastion of capitalization and grammar skills."

SHOP THE FROM THE RUMBLE SEAT STORE

Gameday Depot University Apparel


Regional Co-Managers

Hokiesplat_small BirdGT

Gravatar_small Winfield Featherston

Assistants to the Regional Managers

Ramblinracket_small Ramblin Jeff

Orwin_smith_small Jesse28

Dscn2741cropped_small orientalnc

Nate_small GTNate

Images_small Atlanta's original team

Small LilBroey700

Directors of Personnel

Small acedarney