Defense
I haven't seen much commentary on what people think about the defense this year. I think it would be fair to say that most fans probably expected a rebuiding year when the season started. However, the defense has most likely failed to meet whatever limited expectations you had. I posted a poll to see what people think the problem is this year (coaching, talent, experience, injuries). Specifically if people think Dave Wommack is the problem or if they think there are mitigating circumstances for the defense's performance.
For me, the inexperience excuse goes out the window about midseason. Also, I have never heard so much talk about needing to simplify schemes. If players can't learn a scheme by the end of the season the problem is most likely with the teacher. Certainly there have been some injuries but the defense has been bad most of the year regardless.
When I look at the roster its hard to argue anyone had a good season except Derrick Morgan. Morgan Burnett didn't have the year a lot of people expected. Jefferson had his moments but was fairly inconsistent. Tarrant didn't have a pick all year and he and Butler played very soft coverage for the most part.
The Wommack era is very different from the days of Tenuta. Personally, I was ready for a change but now I am not sure what our overall strategy is. To my untrained eye we can't generate pressure and often are playing soft coverages on the corners. However, we also give up a lot of big plays and opposing teams consistently find wide open receivers.
5 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Caught b/t talent and experience
More and more I am wondering if it is more talent/experience and not just coaching ability.
The college football season is so fragile. It's like a glass ball being pushed around from stadium to stadium by a rhinoceros.
by Winfield Featherston on Dec 7, 2009 11:32 PM EST reply actions
Was it Schlabach....
Who said we had three studs and 8 tackling dummies on D?
I’d like to see them step up and make a name in the biggest game in our lifetime.
by DressHerInWhiteAndGold on Dec 8, 2009 10:47 PM EST reply actions
All of the above
It’s gotta be a bit of everything really.
Experience – DL – Morgan was the only one with real game experience. After injuries we have two sophomores and a freshman plugging the middle (TJ Barnes, Logal Walls, Jason Peters). While we have a couple Juniors on the end beside Morgan, neither of them got much PT because of our 3 NFL D-linemen. Plus we lost 2 DLs to injury (Anderson, Hall)
LBs – Sedric Griffin was really the only guy with experience. Jefferson had played in 20 games, but only had 30 tackles. Kyle Jackson had the second most experience to Griffin but got hurt. Ended up having to play Sylvester (never started, 11 career tackles), and a couple of Freshmen.
Secondary – More experience here, but not incredibly experienced. Bigger problem was line giving the QB all day to throw, although being out of position hurt some too.
Overall, if you look up and down our roster, we have very few seniors and a truckload of freshmen. Only had one senior who played – Griffin.
Injuries – definitely hurt, but no worse than what most teams face. Really, you should have replaced “injuries” with “injuries/depth.” We got beat up pretty badly on the line and linebacker positions, but the hard part was not having people to replace them. Even when we had other people step up, we lost depth that we could have drawn on to keep our D fresh.
Talent – this one takes the cake for me. I don’t see us getting a pass rush aside from Derrick Morgan. To me, that’s not coaching, that’s just the fact that we can’t get a pass rush. Morgan is getting double teamed every play and still gets sacks. The end on the other side is getting single teamed and isn’t getting sacked. I can’t remember how many times I saw Mario Edwards or Brad Jefferson miss tackles for one reason or another. No pass rush + missed tackles = bad defense. Also seemed like we were missing coverage assignments at time too. While you might be able to coach general technique, you can’t coach around missed tackles.
Coaching – maybe a close second. At times, it seemed like our scheme just wasn’t adjusting. uga. Clemson. Miami. Miss St. FSU was particularly weird, we threw just about every scheme we could think of at them and they kept moving the ball.
There were times, however, where the defense looked great. First half against VT. Whole game against UNC. A good portion of the game against Wake.
So I’m not sure entirely if coaching or talent is to blame. I’m certain we don’t have a truckload of all-americans. I’m not ready to write all of them off as no-talent hacks, either. Sometimes we seemed to get outschemed (uga cut back runs up the middle) and others it just seemed like we were giving the quarterback an eon to pick us apart. (FSU, Miami). Any QB will pick apart most defenses with that much time.
We have a relatively inexperienced group. Talent also comes with experience. We also had to change defensive schemes a couple of times this year because of personnel. We’ll be much deeper on defense next year (year of experience + RSs & true freshmen, losing only Sedrick and maybe the Morgans). That depth should help all aspects of the above. I’ll be much more confident in a determination if Wommack is to blame at that time.
i liked
the Tenuta era. It was great seeing our backers always in the back field wreaking havoc
by The_GT_LineageX11 on Dec 12, 2009 1:24 PM EST reply actions
So did I...
except when BC/Matt Ryan made us look silly. At somepoint you have to make in game adjustments and Tenuta never stopped sending them. That was my only gripe. Certainly there were games we overwhelmed opponets as well.

by 














