Derrick Morgan vs. the Iowa OL
Iowa is notorious for poor pass protection. They've allowed almost 30 sacks/season over the last three seasons. Reese Morgan is the offensive line coach and has been for the last 10 years.
Morgan has racked up 19.5 sacks and 29 tackles for loss in his three seasons at Tech. He saw little action his freshman year as he was behind current NFLers Michael Johnson and Darrell Robertson. Last year, Morgan built up his stats and MJ was the focus of opposing OL coaches and their double teams. This season, despite constant double teams, Derrick has continued to improve. What makes him such a force is his strength, speed, and motor (see 2:59 mark). The reason his NFL Draft stock is so high is because he plays hard on every play.
I've already pointed out the fact that Iowa is prone to pass on 3rd down and this tendency has led to a majority of their sacks. Tech fans are generally excited when they look at this match up on paper. If Iowa wants to succeed at all in the passing game, it'll require a heckuvan effort from their freshmen running backs chipping the Beast from Coatesville.
I'm assuming Bulaga, Eubanks, and Calloway are starting alongside Julian Vandervelde and Riley Reiff, the relative weak links. Reiff is a redshirt freshmen with only 12 games of experience. Reiff moved over from defensive end to play guard for the Hawkeyes. Vandervelde is a seasoned junior who's seen a bit of action but never quite had the talent to break into the starting role until attrition slid him in. Look for Morgan to pick up weaknesses in the game film and exploit them.
0 recs |
58 comments
|
Comments
FYI
Reiff is not a weak link on the offensive line. In fact, he is proabaly one of our best linemen. Don’t be fooled by his lack of experience (redshirt Frosh.). He stepped in for Bulaga and played very well at left tackle. He impressed the coaching staff so much they decided to start him at left guard. Heck, after what I saw this season, I’d say Bulaga might be more of a weakness than Reif.
Vandervelde might be the weakest link on the line, but if Dace Richardson can make it back in time, it might not matter. Eubanks has had his moments at center as well. If the Hawks can get the combination of Bulaga, Reif, Eubanks, Richardson, and Calloway, it would go along way in winning the line of scrimage and the point of attack in the run game.
While Iowa’s o-line might have not lived up to expectations this season, I believe they still have the ability to be a dominating force. Remember, the Hawks have had a lot of injury’s to deal with up front.
Iowa’s ability to handle Derrick Morgan might come down to Bulaga. He was beatin at times by guys like Graham, and Schoefield earlier in the season. If Bulaga can get back to playing like he did last season, the Hawks should be able to handle Morgan. If not, it could be a long day for the Hawks.
"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride." HST
by Dip-Shit on Dec 17, 2009 1:40 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
How's Morgan compare to, say,
Brandon Graham (Michigan) or O’Brien Schoefield (Wisconsin)?
Brunettes not fighter jets
Without any research done on the two above mentioned
neither are projected to be picked #3 in the draft
The college football season is so fragile. It's like a glass ball being pushed around from stadium to stadium by a rhinoceros.
by Winfield Featherston on Dec 17, 2009 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Morgan is probably the best DE Iowa will face this year.
That being said. Schofield and Graham are no slouches in their own rights. If Bulaga can get back to using his technique, he will be able to handle Morgan. Bulaga dominated Aaron Maybin last season. Maybin was considered one of the best DE is that class. From what little I have seen of Morgan, I would compare him to Maybin in terms of power and athleticism. Should be a good match-up.
"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride." HST
Morgan was not the best DE faced this year.
In retrospect.
Maybe 5th or 6th best.
Brunettes not fighter jets
And we've seen Corey Wooten who is projecte in the first round
Graham is rated number one in his class but he is not coming out yet, so he is everything Morgan is and could potentially be more from the NFL side of things. That being said, Morgan will go against the Big Ten lineman of the year and a guy expected to go in the Top 20 of the draft. He’ll have his hands full.
Also, Dace Richardson is back for the bowl. He was a mid-season pick as first team All-American. Our O-line will be more than fine for this game.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
Orange Bowl Attendance
It’d be cool if more GTech fans would make it to the orange bowl. The ticket office contacted me this morning to make sure that I was going—they didn’t see I purchased tickets an hour after we beat Clemson…but to date only 10,000 GT fans have bought tickets through the ticket office. Iowa has already sold all 17,000 of their tickets and have requested more. WTF? First BCS game, and orange bowl in over 40 years—you think the fan base would be a little more supportive.
Yo Winfield,
How do you feel about Izaan Cross being move to D. Tackle for the bowl game? You think he is big enough to move Iowa’s front line?
I think he's small
which has me worried. But then, we’ve been having issues with our defensive line all year so what’s one more game?
The college football season is so fragile. It's like a glass ball being pushed around from stadium to stadium by a rhinoceros.
by Winfield Featherston on Dec 17, 2009 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
I haven't seen Morgan
but I’ve seen Wegher get tackled in the backfield a lot this year. Robinson is better, but I’d be shocked if there wasn’t at least 1 TFL.
Sackwise, I’m just hoping if KOK calls a naked bootleg, Stanzi audibles.
It never gets to be easy
Reese Morgan has been coaching the line for 7 years
He’s been at Iowa for 10 years, but not all were coaching the O-line. Just sayin’ that the research on this post is a little….lax.
Before him was Joe Philbin, who is now the Packers O-Coordinator. Philbin coached some great lines, including Outland Trophy winner Robert Gallery.
I believe Iowa’s O-line has two guys projected to go in the draft – Bulaga in the 1st round as a junior, and Calloway in the 3rd round. If Dace Richardson makes it back for the game, you may see him getting talked about as a late rounder, too.
Derrick Morgan is going to be seen in the backfield plenty, but will it be in time to get to Stanzi is the question.
by YouCanPutYourEddsInIt on Dec 17, 2009 6:26 PM EST reply actions
woops.
10 years, 7 years…same difference. All the lines have allowed an abnormally high amount of sacks over the years for some odd reason or another despite the apparent draft-worthy talent. Don’t take your subconscious rage out on me, blame your 10 year 7th year OL coach.
This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
I don't think
Dace will get much of a look in the NFL. He’s had his knees repaired about 17 times too many.
Brunettes not fighter jets
Todd Mcshay
says that Derrick Morgan will have his way with Iowa’s line
by The_GT_LineageX11 on Dec 17, 2009 6:32 PM EST reply actions
Todd McShay predcited Iowa to lose
to Penn State, to Wisconsin, to Michigan State and to get blown out by Ohio State. How’d Todd McShay’s predictions work out? Also, he predicted you would beat Georgia.
But, he did predict Miami would whup up on G Tech. So there’s that. Hehe…
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
well
yall also had to come from behind in almost every one of yalls wins( like Indiana)…. You can’t fall behind and expect to have a good chance to fight back against this offense.
by The_GT_LineageX11 on Dec 17, 2009 8:12 PM EST reply actions
With the way your defense plays,
ANYTHING is possible!
"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride." HST
see but our defense
does seem to be built for allowing teams back in the game so iowa may be ok. They can’t keep up if it turns into an all out track meet though
it won't
we don’t do track…we do football.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Dec 18, 2009 12:07 AM EST up reply actions
yeah
but remember fsu? they fall behind us, like they did against Indiana for instance, they lose. No question about it. The reason they came back against Indiana and in their other games is because their opponent broke down: offense and defense. Our defense, while it does allow teams back in, usually allows them back in over time; eating away at the clock( except for the fsu game lol). and then our offense eats up more clock and scores.
So plain and simple. if Tech is winning at the half, we win.
by The_GT_LineageX11 on Dec 17, 2009 11:38 PM EST reply actions
not really
it’s called coaching. it’s called adjusting. it’s called having resiliant, smart football players. it’s called not panicking. and while you act as though we came back from 20 down in these games, we weren’t. We were down very little. I don’t see a lot of difference in being down 3 points at half and getting the ball to start the second half. these games were essentially tied. what you have conveniently focused away from is that we have utterly dominated teams in the 4th quarter. so you sit back and wait for us to lose steam and get tired. just go ahead. I will be shocked if we don’t outscore you in the 4th.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Dec 18, 2009 12:11 AM EST up reply actions
In fact, here are the numbers on our team's 4th quarter performances
outscored opponents in 4th:
Iowa – 7 games; GT – 5 games
tied the 4th:
Iowa – 2 games; GT – 1 game
were outscored in 4th:
Iowa – 2 games; GT – 6 games
shut out other team in 4th
Iowa – 5 games: GT – 3 games
We were +59 points overall. GT was -3
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
by StoopsMyAss on Dec 18, 2009 12:33 AM EST up reply actions
A quick adjustment to the above
tied the 4th:
Iowa – 3 games; GT – 1 game
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
It should be noted that the three games Stanzi did not play
our 4th Q was:
2 – even
1 – outscored by 3 points
And if you saw the Ohio State game, they scored on the first or second possession of the 4th quarter, so we were like 20 seconds from outscoring them as well. In the overtime, they gained 3 yards and kicked a FG to win. Not exactly a defensive breakdown.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
Bottom line
you’re playing a very, very good defense. The likes of which you have not played all year. You win this game by blowing away our defense, and smart coaches will have you jumping every team but the National Champion in the polls. Spurrier, for example, when we look at his ballot, if you blow us away, will probably have you ranked higher than anyone but ’Bama or Texas. We destroyed him last year in the Outback…he gets it.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
The likes of which you have not played all year
May be a bit of an overstatement. Yes, you guys seem to have the best defense we will face this year, but not by much (if you give any credence to “advanced statistics”).
According to S&P+:
Iowa #6 Overall Defense (#15 Rush D, #3 Pass D)
Clemson #11 Defense (#11 Rush, #15 Pass)
UNC #16 Defense (#18 Rush, #11 Pass)
Virginia Tech #16 Defense (#36 Rush, #9 Pass)
Miami #30 Defense (#17 Rush, #39 Pass)
Or, if you prefer FEI:
Iowa #3 Defense
UNC #7 D
Virginia Tech #13 D
Clemson #16 D
Miami #19 D
The difference? Excluding North Carolina, all of these teams have much better Offenses than Iowa. I think we’ll be OK.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
how does that ranking
Change with GT removed from Clemson, UNC, and VT. We racked it up on all of those guys. I imagine they’d be ranked a little higher.
This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
Good grief
I have no idea. But I do know that both FEI and S&P+ are “opponent adjusted” (the defensive #s take into account the quality of the offenses they faced), so they should be fairly close to the actual quality of those defenses…
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
I posted the answer in an earlier thread
As orang3b stated, FEI is supposed to be adjusted accordingly, but from a pure number stand point such as ypp, if you take away the GT game each of these teams defensive ranking improves anywhere from one to three spots higher.
Over the last two years, time and time again GT has faced an opponent in the top of their conference and in the country defensively, specifically rush defense, and each time we have shattered their average like it was nothing. Teams giving up an average of 100ypg received 300 plus from GT (08 FSU, 09 UNC), some 400 (08 Miami and 08 uga).
"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC
It is clear to us Hawkeye fans
that all this navel gazing with stats and rankings is your way of masking the fact that none of you have ever seen Iowa actually play. Can’t wait.
This is the best part of the season for Iowa fans because we are always matched against a so-called southern speed team, and it is such a treat to read the blogs after the game. Florida’s was my favorite but LSU was pretty good too. The way this is working out, this might be the best yet.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
I don't recall anybody saying "southern speed" here
Except you. Heck, I say Anthony Allen is downright slow. Though I admit I might buy into the idea that the “genius” CPJ would out-scheme you…
What counts as watching Iowa actually play? I saw all (or at least most) of the Penn State, Michigan, and Indiana games, plus parts of other games. Does that count, or did I have to drive to Iowa to watch a game in person to get credit here?
As for the stats gazing, everything that I see says this is a great matchup. Our great offense vs your great defense; your terrible offense vs our terrible defense; both strengths and weaknesses are nearly identical (but opposite) in their rankings.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
Then write a post showing you have seen Iowa
don’t run over to some stats website and essentially regurgitate it. This isn’t a midterm paper, it’s a football blog. Show us you’re watching football games.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
I'd be saying the same thing as Bird
Just without all the pretty charts. Your defense is great, your offense sucks.
"Statistics are like bikinis. What they reveal is suggestive, but what they conceal is vital." - Aaron Levenstein
You guys crack me up.
I think we should re-weight Iowa’s d-ranking based on playing PSU, MSU, WI, and OSU in Iowa City instead of on the road, factoring a risk-adjusted, beer-infused, our-girls-have-better-skin-so-we-play-harder coefficient (for more information on the latter, check with our man Clayborn). Heck, after we do that, we beat Penn State and they actually score NFP! (This is a term of art — coined by John Irving while getting toasted in Dave’s Foxhead one afternoon, somewhat annoyed that Kurdelmeier wouldn’t let him work out with the wrestling team, which, you may have heard, has won 87 of the last 92 national championships, and means NEGATIVE FUCKING POINTS (a real number, sure, less than zero?) known only graduates of the Iowa Writers Workshop, (and Brent Metcalfe, who is scarier even than the evil genius), which is, as you know, not the Georgia Tech of writing MFAs, but rather, the MIT/Moscow State University of writing MFAs.
(This does not mean anything in this post is fictional. Because this is all true.)
After all, the Orange Bowl will be mostly Iowans, so we need to assume greater defensive mayhem and accordingly adjust, homogenize, trick, weight, you get the idea, the raw data (by that I mean, the actual scores of the actual games) owing to friendly confines, noise, and superior pork tenderloin sandwiches. Next we will fit this historical defensive site-adjusted performance curve to our future Iowa Hawkeye We’re-Undefeated-Again model, which, strangely, looks like a fucking hockey stick going up up up! … hmm, might have a real story here. MTF, cf. BHGP, a peer-reviewed, quasi-obscene, delightful mishmash of the high and the low.
One serious thought though, since your noses are buried in the tables, and liking it. Excellence does not increase in linear increments. What you find is that it is, in fact, logarithmic. There might be quite a gap between #3 and the mean of your other four ACC schools, 13 (or between #6 and #20).
Mr. Boh Knows ...
Our superior pork tenderloin sandwiches will fuck your wimins and burn down your places of business!
by Bucketochicken on Dec 18, 2009 7:13 PM EST up reply actions
I half expect one of these accountants to come back with a post
that quantifies Johnson’s coin flips calls. I’m really looking forward to that one. I know the old “heads side has more weight” but we’ll see if they have some website they can regurgitate some stats on it for us.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
actually...
We only won one coin flip all year and it was the Wake Forest OT coin toss.
Question for you guys, though. Why are you so pissed off about this game? I keep reading your comments where you’ve created this idea that we’re a villainous GT blog that only cares about tearing down your beloved Hawkeyes.
“Southern Speed.” “You guys haven’t seen us play.” “I eat rat poison frequently!” – All phrases I’ve been reading from Iowa fans lately.
I’m just trying figure out why you’re all so angry. We’re just previewing the game through a lot of different perspectives. If you don’t like our style, then just read BHGP. There’s no need to get worked up about it, in my opinion.
You are a sad, strange little man, and you have my pity.
It's annoying.
No one’s angry, a few are annoyed, or, certainly amused (c’est moi).
People from little states no one ever visits would like to at least be accurately reviewed, but some of the analysis here — such as assuming that Iowa plays defense like VT — is so disturbed and weird and, frankly, stupid, as to cause involuntary WTF imprecations.
Anyway, you have a great web site and you are fun guys and this is going to be a superb game. I’d stop looking at statistics tables and assuming that Iowa plays like UNC, but that’s just me. Norm just pointed out that he’s been studying triple option football since 1965, and the best Johnson offense was at Hawaii in the 1980’s, so that may indicate why we are less than overwhelmed with the OMFG they play the option football, thing. Big deal. GT plays the best option football in the universe right now; and?? And what?
In Iowa we talk everyday about things that happened a couple of generations ago, and communities endure this or that fad or fluctuation. Such is football.
Good luck and maybe take a look at who you are actually playing. It’s not UNC. Fershur, ya, you betcha, and maybe you want to think about this: the sweetest DC in the Big Ten, Norm Parker, delivers a top 5 (nationally) physical defense. More physical than OSU, more than Southern Cal, more than, for God’s sake, Penn State. Your guys will be glad they have mouthpieces.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
for example
The VT comment, I made was NOTHING ABOUT THE BLITZING nature of Bud Foster vs. Norm Parker. I was inferring from your comment that you guys played boundary/field corners. Obviously, that’s wrong. You play a right and left corner – no matter the field position, match up, blitz, etc.. Okay, you never made a clear statement about what your defensive backfield philosophy was.
However, I CLEARLY stated in the post about Bay Bay vs. Amari that I didn’t know what Iowa’s secondary philosophy was. As I’ve done in all of my posts, I asked for clarification from Iowa fans. Instead, I get these ridiculous rants about how GT fans are rude, ridiculous, backward, uneducated, accountants, etc…
So I think I’ve stated my thoughts on the issue enough. I’m actually tired of talking about Iowa and listening to ridiculous Iowa fans. I think we’ll probably just focus on basketball ‘til the bowl’s over.
You are a sad, strange little man, and you have my pity.
JUst as long as you don't post any more
Iowa is just like (fill in blank). I don’t think you’ve seen too many, G Tech is just like 1987 Oklahoma…or Cal Poly circa 2006 or some such nonsense.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
now
if were down…. well, thats another story
by The_GT_LineageX11 on Dec 17, 2009 11:39 PM EST reply actions
Morgan is the real deal, obviously.
But you need to hire somebody from out of town to evaluate the Iowa O-line.
In regard to sacks, your historical summary is badly skewed by including one and half seasons of Iowa’s most troubling, and troubled, QB this decade. Jake Christiansen squeezed the ball so hard it went flat. Then we started a rookie for 70% of last year. It’s college football: three years ago is meaningless (ask Michigan, I believe three years ago they were beating Florida?).
If Dace can stay healthy there is a reasonable probability that the top six guys are eventually in NFL camps. (The one I’m not sure about is Raph.) Reiff has already been singled out by Ferentz as one of the next great Iowa OT, and the next great Iowa OT always goes in the first round, where Bulaga is currently slotted — as a 20 year-old junior. We don’t think he’s our best lineman this year, incidentally.
Griese said before the Minnesota game that his tape review showed Iowa to have the best O-line in the Big Ten by November. Obviously, this is Ferentz’ metier, the one pure thing he enjoys most — to the point where when he was asked about the Notre Dame job, he said, “I may change jobs someday, but it will be to coach O-line at some nonscholarship little place no one has ever heard of.”
I’d go on but it would sound parochial. However, a last point: while Tony Moeaki may be the most athletic guy on the Iowa offense, he’s also a devastating blocker. (Moeaki is so scary up the seams that he was triple-teamed by mid-season. But he might be a better blocker, when he doesn’t get injured pouring skim milk on his Cheerios.)
I’ll be curious to see how Morgan handles a zone blocking scheme, which is predicating on influencing rather than the one-on-one or two-on-one matchups that monstrous freaking superguys like Morgan usually prefer.
Did GT play anyone with a mature zone blocking rush scheme this year?
Does Morgan do a good job staying home? Because if he doesn’t, he will be on skates going sideways while A-Rob goes for 150. We want to play linemen who overcommit to penetration.
Norm will just tell Bulaga, Reiff and Morse, in regard Morgan: “Great guy, bring the respect, but same shit different day. Wooten, Minor and Schofield are freaks too, and all four will start on Sunday.”
Net: we don’t get hepped up about individuals, no matter how extraordinary. We play as a team, and generally beat anyone who doesn’t. It would seem GT is struggling with the team defense concept. And as Stoops suggests, we don’t get tired in the 4Q. You may shut down the Iowa run game for 2.5 quarters — and we won’t care at all.
Mr. Boh Knows ...
answers
Did GT play anyone with a mature zone blocking rush scheme this year?
The best zone blocking teams we’ve faced recently were WVU in 2006 and now FSU is using it with great effectiveness. Most of the teams in the ACC have old school O coordinators with the basic hat on hat philosophy. Jimbo Fisher is the future of ACC offenses.
Does Morgan do a good job staying home?
Morgan is the only legitimate D-I athlete on our defensive line. The NFL hype is not misguided. He averages about 4 tackles a game but the QB hurries he applies and the disruption he causes in the run game because of his strength is invaluable.
It would seem GT is struggling with the team defense concept.
This is a major issue. We have only 1 senior starting on defense. We’ve rotated about 4-5 defensive tackles and have no real push up front. Despite these facts, Morgan has played one man wrecking crew all season. Eventually offensive lines have relented to his persistent play. And typically, this is when it hurts offenses most – game saving TFL’s against Wake and Clemson. His play reminds me of Keith Brooking – a phenom amongst pedestrians playing 1 v. 11 football.
The major flaw in Wommack’s D is his terrible use of zone blitzes. Generally GT fans feel the D’s ineptitude stems from poor zone coverage coaching, poor blitz designs, and lack of experience/talent. The result is the worst defense since Ted Roof’s days.
This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
Morgan is the real deal
And the bright spot on a less than stellar defense. If he had an above average player on the other side of the line he would be not just a monster but also rack up huge stats.
I watched him dominate the first half of the first Clemson game. What I can’t remember is what happened in the second half? He only had three of his 10 tackles, none for loss and no sacks. Did Clemson make that much of an adjustment or did he run out of gas in an early season game? My guess it was adjustments, he only had two tackles in the ACC Championship. Of course GT won both of those games so it doesn’t make much of a difference.
What isn’t shown on the stats I can find is QB hurries which maybe what he was doing in both games but it doesn’t take a genius to audible away from his side of the field and run through the weak side or throw screens over his head. It is a matter of recognition and making adjustments in game.
Seriously, what isn't better with bacon?
by The Bacon Explosion on Dec 18, 2009 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
Remember boys and girls.
This game will be a marathon, not a track meet.
"The possibility of physical and mental collapse is now very real. No sympathy for the Devil, keep that in mind. Buy the ticket, take the ride." HST
I think
Iowa wants it to a slow and boring game. GT wants a fast offensive game. I’d say somewhere in the middle will be fun.
This new learning amazes me, Sir Bedevere. Explain again how sheep's bladders may be employed to prevent earthquakes.
I'm sure it'll be a great game
But to keep it completely biased, GT will shred Iowa’s defense turning their players into a bunch of timing officials as they watch our guys drop 10+ plays of 40+ yards on them. They’ll learn real assignment defense on Jan 5th.
"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC
OR
Iowa’s down lineman will continually get penetration, completely disrupting GTs O, and Nesbitt will be shown crying on the bench with 5 minutes left in the 2nd quarter as CPJ screams at him for 5 straight minutes with the score 28-0 Iowa, after 2 offensive TDs, a taint, and a punt RfT. Hmmm.
To each his own
"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC
I think Jesse is a little
intimidated by the Big Ten machine….check out his signature. In all fairness, it is a machine.
"I think it's safe to say our concerns are many." -- Kirk Ferentz
Haha
You sir, are a drater. First, my “To each his own” response was simply agreeing that txhawkeye is clearly entitled to his own opinion just as I am and I’m okay with that. He didn’t even need to explain it as I understood it from the beginning. You, however, fail at reading comprehension. Please read my signature again and once you have it figured out, let me know. Here’s a hint, it has nothing to do with the Big Ten.
"Big Ten can have this challenge. Duke loses, we all win..."
-Marcus Ginyard, G - UNC
Offensive Line Blamed For Sacks
I don’t have a computer, so I don’t have the stats. I think that Iowa’s QBs are responsible for more sacks than the Awesomive line. Their QBs roll into defensive ends, or stand there waiting for the #2 (and last) route to open up. It has been the the most frustrating aspect of watching God’s team.

by 













